Dear google reader developers…
Saturday, February 28th, 2009Automatic translation is nice, but please, allow it on a per-post basis instead of per-feed. kthxbye. (more…)
Automatic translation is nice, but please, allow it on a per-post basis instead of per-feed. kthxbye. (more…)
People, if Chinese Democracy was already reported to have cost $13M in 2001, maybe giving such a number now would be misleading since most of the tracks were recorded a few more times since then.
Replacing Brian May’s nice and clean job with some butchered (probably fretless) thing. (more…)
So they renamed their tags as folders. But they still act as tags. Don’t people get confused by the “change folders” behavior?
Downloading gmail mac notifier brings a dmg file (ok) which only contains a shell script (wt?) which opens another URL to download the notifier (W-T-F-F?!). What’s wrong with you, people, seriously?
Dear Trent,
Your website sucks. Deeply. Oh, not as much as, say, voyage-sncf (which is the high level standard for suckage), but it sucks in its own way. It sometimes looks (and works) like a weblog or even a photoblog, but there’s no history. And when you’re posting 5-6 photos in a row, only crackheads doing a reload every minute can have a chance to pick all of them.
Your website sucks. And to compensate the high suckage level of your website, people built their own website posting everything you post there. But like I said, if they don’t have enough crack incoming, they might miss a post every now and then.
There are different solutions. You could probably enable full content in the corresponding feed, this way we will at least be able to see the content and you won’t have to change the visual aspect of your site, if that’s the problem. And this way, we don’t have to think about the thousands of fan comments (“I love you, Trent”, “come play to my house”, “alessandro is so sexy”, etc…). And I know you can post this content to the full-content feed, because you just do it for the “real” news. Another solution would be to post those pictures on flickr. It’s not like it would be difficult, again, since you’re already doing it for a selection of photos. Having pixelised phone camera pictures in the middle of dark blurry in-concert (not even large) pictures wouldn’t be such a drama.
Thanks for listening, Trent. Think of the ki^H^Hwebsite.
PS: don’t forget to free Robin in time for the VMA. Let him rehearse a bit, I’m sure Josh can help him too.
You’re welcome to smoke, and to play with your own poop. Just keep your smoke, and your poop, off of me. — jwz.
Brain damaged firefox developers! Now, I have pleasure using firefox2.
So, let’s say that I want to buy Adobe Lightroom. It seems to be a nifty software and I may like it better that the software bundled with my camera. So I go to Adobe’s website. Lightroom, right. $299. Well, seems fair.
But then, the troubles arrive. I’ll click on “buy online”. I’m in France, as it asks. And now the price is 297.80 EUR. What?! Can someone tell Adobe about the current euro/dollar rate? Currently, Google tells me that $299 is really 190 EUR. Even with the taxes, it wouldn’t reach more than 230 EUR.
Ok, there’s a “download” option, let’s use that. But now the price is 301.29 EUR. Uh? Can someone tell Adobe that usually, “download editions” are meant to have a lower price, since the editor doesn’t have to handle physical packages to send?
Duh, I’ll stick to my bundled software and eventually gimp/seashore, thanks.
I don’t like (or just don’t feel confident enough to use) bugzilla because:
I don’t like (seriously) mantis because: